Frequency domain methods obtain a solution for one frequency at one simulation.
Therefore, multiple simulations have to be performed to obtain a broad band solution.
However, fast frequency sweep interpolation techniques have been developed for efficient
broad band simulations [22]. Therefore, the main restriction for the
frequency domain methods consists of the model size determined by the number of unknowns.
Methods with volume discretization, such as, for instance, the finite element method
(FEM) or the finite difference frequency domain method (FDFD) are generally based on
sparse matrices, which enable models to be solved with significantly more unknowns than
methods with dense matrices, like the classical method of moments. However, sparse matrix
methods are also not capable of handling complex PCBs inside a metallic enclosure. For
example, the interposer simulation of [10] was meshed cubically with
594.000.000 mesh nodes. Assuming a mesh size reduction by a factor 5 by tetrahedral
meshing, the remaining 118.800.000 mesh nodes would require about 5.7e9 nonzero elements
to be handled in a sparse matrix, with a memory requirement of about 91GByte. Methods,
that require only surface discretization, such as the standard MoM, the boundary element
method (BEM), or the PEEC method may be used to avoid the meshing of the surrounding
space [23]. However, these methods are initially based on dense matrices and,
therefore, require significantly more memory and a larger simulation time. Thus, none of
these methods is capable of handling a complex PCB under a metallic enclosure cover.
Recent developments of three-dimensional full wave simulation methods are fast
multipole methods used to simulate electrically large scattering and enclosure shielding
models [24][25]
[26][27][28]. The MLFMM drastically reduces
the memory cost for field integral equation solutions to O(N logN), where N is the number
of unknowns. In comparison, a standard MoM algorithm requires O(N2)
memory. However, this memory reduction is feasible solely on electrically large models,
because the MLFMM uses only propagating plane waves and therefore succumbs to a severe
numerical instability, when dealing with interactions of source and observer points which
are closer than approximately one wavelength. The recently developed NSPWMLFMA which is
numerically stable in the near field region, is however based on dense matrices
[26]. Therefore, it is not suitable for PCB, slim enclosure, and IC
package simulations with dense structures in the near field region.
This work presents
an efficient simulation method for the cavity field between a PCB ground plane and a
metallic enclosure cover, which is parallel to the ground plane at an electrically short
distance. The interface of the cavity field to the external environment of the device is
given by the open slots at the cavity boundaries. A new domain separation approach by
port interfaces and a PMC boundary condition at the slot surfaces enables the separate
simulation of the internal and the external field with different methods. The internal
field can be calculated with the efficient cavity model, while the external environment
can be simulated with any three-dimensional full wave method which is able to handle a
PMC boundary condition and excitation current ports. The fast multipole method provides a
powerful opportunity for this external device environment simulation, because recent
developments by [28] enable a coupling with network simulations.
The mentioned examples, based on recently published manuscripts, indicate that
there is actually no single method capable of handling the whole device EMC simulation.
Every method has some constraints which limit the usable model size, frequency range or
domain. Combining different methods provides an efficient solution to overcome this
problem. The cavity model of this work handles the internal enclosure simulation with
maximum efficiency by analytical or two-dimensional numerical methods. The external
environment (i.e. a cable harness) may be modeled by existing efficient methods for this
purpose. An efficient approach for the modeling of the emissions from cable harnesses was
published in [29][30].