Material parameters as used by different group are given in Table 3.7, while Table 3.8 summarizes the experimental and theoretical values of the elastic constants , , and , available for wurtzite AlN in the literature. From these the corresponding , , , and are calculated. The experimental values from [165] are adopted in the MC simulation.
Bandgap energy | Electron mass | Non-parabolicity | Scattering models | Ref. | |||||||||||
U | ADP | ||||||||||||||
eV | eV | eV | m | m | m | 1/eV | 1/eV | 1/eV | eV | meV | meV | g/cm | - | - | |
6.20 | 6.90 | - | 0.48 | 1.0 | - | 0.044 | 0 | - | 9.5 | 99.2 | 99.2 | 3.23 | 8.5 | 4.77 | [246] |
5.84 | 7.00 | 8.29 | 0.326 | 0.384 | 0.473 | 0.29 | - | - | 9.5 | 75.8 | 110.3 | 3.23 | 8.5 | 4.46 | [153] |
6.00 | 7.05 | 8.49 | 0.26 | 0.495 | 0.55 | 0.207 | 0.035 | 0.023 | - | 76.1 | 110.7 | - | - | 4.68 | [247] |
6.20 | 6.90 | 8.20 | 0.33 | 0.40 | 0.50 | 0.044 | 0 | 0 | 9.5 | 99.2 | 99.2 | 3.23 | 8.5 | 4.77 |
Data | Refs. | |||||||
GPa | GPa | GPa | GPa | GPa | m/s | m/s | ||
345 | 125 | 118 | exp. | [248] | 351 | 115 | 10430 | 5962 |
411 | 149 | 125 | exp. | [249] | 406 | 127 | 11214 | 6280 |
410 | 140 | 120 | exp. | [165] | 398 | 126 | 11100 | 6246 |
380 | 114 | 109 | calc. | [250] | 361 | 119 | 10569 | 6060 |
464 | 149 | 128 | calc. | [251] | 440 | 140 | 11677 | 6579 |
424 | 103 | 138 | calc. | [166] | 406 | 147 | 11211 | 6746 |
398 | 140 | 96 | calc. | [167] | 372 | 109 | 10726 | 5814 |
396 | 137 | 116 | calc. | [168] | 385 | 121 | 10920 | 6131 |
398 | 142 | 127 | calc. | [169] | 397 | 127 | 11089 | 6280 |
Table 3.9 summarizes the experimental and theoretical values of the piezoelectric coefficients , , and .
Data | Refs. | |||||
C/m | C/m | C/m | Data | Refs. | C/m | C/m |
-0.48 | -0.58 | 1.55 | exp. | [248] | 0.251 | 0.304 |
- | -0.60 | 1.50 | exp. | [171] | 0.260 | 0.334 |
-0.29 | -0.58 | 1.39 | exp. | [252] | 0.102 | 0.230 |
- | -0.60 | 1.46 | calc. | [172] | 0.251 | 0.326 |
- | -0.38 | 1.29 | calc. | [169] | 0.169 | 0.187 |
- | -0.64 | 1.80 | calc. | [174] | 0.349 | 0.429 |
Fig. 3.14 compares the MC simulation result for AlN against others from [253,246,254]. The simulation results are in good agreement with [253,246], since similar MC parameters are used as shown in Table 3.7. The difference visible at high fields can be explained by different effective electron masses used in the higher valleys. The simulation of [254] differs at low fields, since it ignores some mechanisms, e.g. ionized-impurity scattering.
|