All Scharfetter-Gummel discretisation
variants can solve the six moments Boltzmann
Poisson system reliably for the closure parameter .
By stepping the parameter
we found that there seems to be
a certain sharp value of
below which no convergence can
be reached.
Especially,
for closure with the solver fails to converge
on certain benchmark examples no matter
which Scharfetter-Gummel style
discretization we choose. Overall it is found that none of the (supposedly)
more sophisticated
methods can improve much on the original Scharfetter-Gummel
style discretization.
Initially we blamed the central differencing effects
to be the cause for the failure, as these effects are much
more pronounced in simulations using .
However, blaming central differencing effects alone
for non-convergence misses the point as is proved
by the naive discretization which we
termed the ``double grid discretization'' in Section
4.1.2.
Surprisingly the double grid discretization
outperforms Scharfetter
Gummel with respect to nonlinear convergence
for . From
simulation results
it was found that for closures with
the system of equations
can exhibit oscillations in the solution.
A typical result is depicted in Figure 4.2,
Also the overall convergence behaviour is more regular and sensible. Paradoxically, we observed that in the case of Scharfetter-Gummel style discretizations global refinement often makes the convergence worse. This effect is also diminished with the double grid discretization. At the time being we do not really understand the reason for the in these respects superior performance of the double grid discretization.
The main drawback of the scheme is that it is not clear how to extend it to dimensions two and three on an unstructured grid, although it generalizes easily to equispaced meshes in higher dimensions. We see the main accomplishment of this scheme in the proof that there is still room for improving on Scharfetter-Gummel style discretizations. At least part of the blame for non-convergence has to be put on the discretization, though we found that the kind of applied highest order moment closure is a bigger factor. For closures consistent with bulk Monte Carlo data Scharfetter-Gummel style discretizations perform superiorly.
We have not provided any theoretical analysis of the numerical properties of the applied discretizations. It is an open problem to adapt a scheme which allows for estimates of the entropy (in the style of [Rin01]) to our models.
Previous: 4.1.2 Double Grid Discretization
Up: 4.1 Discretization
Next: 4.2 Consistent Highest Order