nextupprevious
Next:3. Numerical Discretization MethodsUp:2.2 OxidationPrevious:2.2.2 Point Defect Models

2.2.3 Segregation Effects Arising at the Moving Interface

In contrast to the segregation effect described in the previous section where the interface is assumed to be stationary, now an additional effect namely the moving interface due to oxidation phenomena has to be taken into account (Fig. 2.4):
Figure 2.4: Model of a segregation effect at the moving interface between silicon and silicon dioxide
\resizebox{7cm}{!}{\includegraphics{/iue/a39/users/radi/fig/physics/oxidseg.eps}}
Ignoring the mass transport phenomena described in Section 2.1.3, which is equivalent to the conditions Fi = 0, Fsi = 0, and Fox = 0, the concentration Coxnew would be proportional to the interface concentration Csieq
Coxnew$\displaystyle \alpha$ . Csieq     (2.44)


where $ \alpha$$ \approx$ 0.44. This corresponds with the fact that under equilibrium conditions also

Csieq = m . Coxnew     (2.45)


must be fulfilled causing m$ {\frac{1}{\alpha}}$. Under normal circumstances this is not true. Depending on the species different ratios between m and $ \alpha$ have been found (Fig. 2.5):

Figure 2.5: Segregation effects of arsenic, boron and phosphorus at the moving interface between silicon and silicon dioxide
\resizebox{9.5cm}{!}{\includegraphics{/iue/a39/users/radi/diss/fig/physics/segboron.eps}}
The following general rules can be estimated for the segregation effect during an oxidizing process:
nextupprevious
Next:3. Numerical Discretization MethodsUp:2.2 OxidationPrevious:2.2.2 Point Defect Models
Mustafa Radi

1998-12-11