It is convenient to define a quantity
to express the electron number per unit volume with quasi-momenta
in the infinitesimal volume around and which have been scattered during the infinitesimal time interval :
|
(2.50) |
As the volume is infinitesimal, the scattering results in an electron being removed from this volume. Therefore
(2.50) can also be considered as the number of electrons which are lost from the volume around during the time interval
due to scattering.
The quantity
can be found from the fact that the expression
is the probability that any electron from the vicinity of point has been scattered during the time interval and thus the total number of
the scattered electrons in around is equal to
|
(2.51) |
Comparison with (2.50) gives
|
(2.52) |
where the minus sign shows that this quantity describes the loss of electrons.
Scattering processes can change the distribution function in the opposite way. In addition to the scattering out
of the domain there also exist scattering processes leading to a gain of electrons in . To describe these processes it is
natural to introduce the quantity
defined so that the expression
|
(2.53) |
gives the number of electrons per unit volume which are scattered into the volume around during the infinitesimal time interval .
In order to find
it is necessary to consider electrons in
near
which
are scattered into and sum over all possible
. The total number of electrons in
is equal to
. From this number of electrons only
would be
scattered into around during if the corresponding states were not occupied. However only the fraction
of the states are available. Thus, the total number of electrons per unit volume scattered into around from
around
during is equal to
|
(2.54) |
Summing over all possible
and comparing with (2.53) gives:
|
(2.55) |
Now the collision integral in (2.46) can be expressed as a sum of two terms:
It should be noted that in the non-degenerate case when
the scattering operator can be rewritten as:
|
(2.57) |
where the total scattering rate
is defined as follows:
|
(2.58) |
The Boltzmann equation takes now the form:
S. Smirnov: