Next: 4.1.3 The Real Device
Up: 4.1 GaAs versus SiGe
Previous: 4.1.1 The Test Device
A SiGe HBT with a realistic device structure (see Fig. 4.6, left) from
[67] and the Monte Carlo simulation results there was employed for further
tuning of MINIMOS-NT models which are used in HD simulations. A comparison,
similar to the one presented in [67] was performed. The MC simulation
results were compared to DD and HD results obtained with MINIMOS-NT for the
electron concentration, the electrostatic potential, the electron velocity, and
the electron temperature distribution in the device (see Fig. 4.6). Such
comparisons are useful not only to verify the validity of the models for SiGe
and the HD transport model, but also to gain an insight why and where the HD
model should be used having in mind the higher computational effort.
Figure 4.6:
The HBT structure and electron temperature distribution in the device:
Simulation results at V = 0.87 V and V = 1 V
|
In [62] the capabilities of MINIMOS-NT were demonstrated by a HD
mixed-mode device-circuit simulation of a 5-stage Current-Mode Logic (CML) ring
oscillator containing 10 SiGe HBTs (Fig. 4.7). The DD simulation shows a
much lower inverter delay time compared to the HD simulation (see
Fig. 4.8). This is due to the velocity overshoot in the base-collector
space charge region which cannot be modeled using a DD simulation [67].
Furthermore, since the current is higher in the case of HD simulation, the
overall speed of the circuit increases. The error of the DD simulation in the
inverter delay is in the range of 60% compared to the HD simulation, thus
proving the necessity of a HD model.
Figure 4.7:
CML ring oscillator circuit
|
Figure 4.8:
Comparison of DD vs. HD transient response
|
This example, together with the example presented in the following section, not
only confirms the capabilities of MINIMOS-NT to handle complex device structures
(such as HBT structures), but also confirms the correct modeling so far of the
properties of SiGe in the simulator. The results are quite promising taking
into consideration that the emphasis of the work was put on III-V materials and
devices.
Next: 4.1.3 The Real Device
Up: 4.1 GaAs versus SiGe
Previous: 4.1.1 The Test Device
Vassil Palankovski
2001-02-28