The activation of the -doping and the backside
-doping, as given in Fig. 3.1, in the device depends mainly on the materials system and the
thickness of the spacer between the doping and the channel [276].
In order to estimate the available carrier concentration to be
assumed for the simulation in relation to the nominally amount of
Si doping introduced by MBE growth, Fig. 3.24 shows an
idealized function of the active
of MBE grown nominal
doping density. Without any processing for a given
quantum well the active concentration rises linearly with
up to 4
10
cm
, after that the density
saturates at values of about 5.5
10
cm
.
For bulk GaAs in [148] the active concentration
is strictly proportional to
up to 4
10
cm
in GaAs
independent of the growth temperature. When
applying semiconductor processes to the gate area, effects
reducing the carrier densities
in the channel are found. As
an explanation chemical or semiconductor surface induced
mechanisms [122,127] have been suggested to effectively
reduce the number of available carriers. It was found by inverse
modeling for the processes simulated in this work,
that if semiconductor processes
with etch parameters reducing the activation are
applied,
is reduced by a fixed amount, rather than further
reducing the slope of the active concentration
in
Fig. 3.24.
For the extraction of the backside doping inverse modeling suggests a doping efficiency of 40%-60% for the technologies pseudomorphic AlGaAs/InGaAs HEMTs. Thus, the backside doping is less efficient in comparison with the upper doping as given in Fig. 3.24, since it is subject to compensation mechanism from the backside buffer, e.g. due to acceptors [16].