next up previous
Next: 3.6.4 Contacts Up: 3.6 Extraction Procedures and Previous: 3.6.2 Doping Activation

3.6.3 Surface Potentials

In contradiction to a number of publications the surface charge density or corresponding surface potential [50] is not considered an arbitrary fitting parameter in this work. A strong pinning of the surface prevails for the SiN/AlGaAs interface which significantly interferes with the transport near the surface [116]. Typical depletion depths even for doping concentrations of $ {\it N}_{\mathrm{D}}=
3\times10^{18}$cm$ ^{-3}$ amount to $ \approx $ 10 nm, as can be calculated with a one-dimensional Schrödinger Poisson solver [95]. Given the scaled gate geometries, this depletion interferes with channel transport. The everlasting attempts to process stable GaAs based Metal Insulator (MIS) transistors, e.g. [229], shows that it is nearly impossible to depin the Fermi level at SiN/GaAs based III-V semiconductor interfaces, which is a prerequisite to obtain a channel as in a Si MOSFET. For III-V semiconductors Table 3.37 gives a collection of pinning levels taken from literature, always measured from the valence band edge.

Table 3.37: Energies of the pinned Fermi level.
Material $ E_F$ References
  [eV]  
n-GaAs 0.61,0.72 [256,323]
Al$ _{x}$Ga$ _{1-x}$As 0.8 [256]
In$ _{0.52}$Al$ _{0.48}$As/SiN 0.8-1 [18]
In$ _y$Al$ _{1-y}$As/SiN 0.42 $ \leq$y $ \leq$ 0.57 0.9-1.3 [66]
In$ _{0.53}$Ga$ _{0.47}$As/SiN 0.37-0.77 [18]


For the most relevant barrier materials AlGaAs and cap material GaAs the Fermi level is typically pinned near midgap. For InAlAs the level are typical higher than midgap.


next up previous
Next: 3.6.4 Contacts Up: 3.6 Extraction Procedures and Previous: 3.6.2 Doping Activation
Quay
2001-12-21