next up previous
Next: 5.4 Summary Up: 5.3.4 Sensitivity Analysis Previous: 5.3.4.1 Variation of the

5.3.4.2 Variation of the Vertical n-Doping Width

Figure 5.14: On-resistance for variations of the n-doping width.
\begin{figure}{
\begin{center}
\resizebox{14cm}{!}{
\psfrag{Id [A]}[t]{$\mathsf{...
...}$}
\includegraphics[width=14cm]{eps/n-100V-rdson.eps}}\end{center}}\end{figure}

Figure 5.15: Maximum electric field for variations of the n-doping width.
\begin{figure}{
\begin{center}
\resizebox{14cm}{!}{
\psfrag{Vds [V]}[t]{$\mathsf...
...
\includegraphics[width=14cm]{eps/n-100V-maxField.eps}}\end{center}}\end{figure}

Fig. 5.14 and Fig. 5.15 show the effects of varying the width of the mask for the vertical n-doped area on the on-resistance and the maximum electric field, respectively. Reducing the mask width by \ensuremath{\mathrm{0.5~\mu
m}} increases the on-resistance to values which are similar to those of the standard device. An increase of the mask width by 0.5 $ \mu$m results in an approximately 4% lower on-resistance than in the optimized device.

Reducing the width of the n-doped area decreases the maximum of the electric field by approximately 12% compared to the optimized device. In the device with increased width of the n-doped area the maximum of the electric field is approximately 16% higher than for the optimized device. The critical field of 300 kV cm- 1 is reached for a gate voltage of approximately 110 V.

To achieve an improved on-resistance and reliable device performance the variation of the width of the vertical n-doped area has to be monitored.


next up previous
Next: 5.4 Summary Up: 5.3.4 Sensitivity Analysis Previous: 5.3.4.1 Variation of the
Martin Rottinger
1999-05-31