We propose several possible physical causes for the above phenomena as follows:
is assumed in the calculation.
The second example corresponds to
Figure 2.9. A large-area
device contains
small devices in the latter case.
Let us consider the total depletion in the gate. Moving carriers are
neglected. The surface electric field governed by the oxide
field
is negligibly influenced by variations in
,
because of
. We omit
from discussion. The
gate capacitance
in depletion is related to
by
. Therefore,
becomes approximately
gaussian distributed as well. For the bulk capacitance
in 2.23,
holds on the
inversion side of the
-
curve. Thereby, the gate capacitance
becomes
which
can be further approximated by
, valid
if
. Simple analytical considerations lead to
, where the line over the
quantity denotes the mathematical expectation. Similarly, for the
surface potential in depletion
one obtains
. We have exploited
the inequality
, valid for a random
variable
which is gaussian distributed. Therefore, the statistical
variations in the gate doping not only induce fluctuations in
across the large device, but also increase the mean value
of
and lower the mean value of
measured on a large
device. A similar result has been obtained by numerical simulation of
the effect of bulk doping fluctuations on the threshold voltage of
small MOSFETs in [339]. The slight changes of
and
in depletion region following from analytical
considerations are completely in coherence with results from
statistical simulations, Figure 2.13.
More important than small changes occurring in the gate depletion is
the impact of the point fluctuations of dopants on inversion at the
gate/oxide interface. Let us assume . It
follows
for the Debye length at
. A
parallelopiped with
base and
height (comparable with the depth of depleted region) contains only
dopant atoms on average, namely there are
atoms in
the first
from the gate/oxide interface. Any macroscopic
approach to
and space charge density is no longer valid with
respect to the carrier concentrations. Model-calculations accounting
for the dopant fluctuations and experiments have shown that the
stretch-out of the gate-channel capacitance of MOS-system already
takes place at a bulk doping of
at room
temperature [504] (see also [506]). The same effect
occurs in the gate-channel capacitance associated with the gate
(minority carrier component in
on the inversion side),
producing a stretch-out in
as well. This effect has been at
least qualitatively reproduced in our statistical simulations shown
in Figure 2.13, in comparison with experimental
data for similar devices. Moreover, by increasing the dopant
concentration
, the gate-channel capacitance becomes
smoother. This fact can qualitatively explain Fig.1 in [281],
which shows a fast inversion in the low-doped gate and a smooth
recovery for the heavy-doped one. Finally, we think the random
distribution of dopants in a shallow depleted region close to the
gate/oxide interface is an obvious explanation for the smooth
inversion in heavily doped gates [167].