We propose several possible physical causes for the above phenomena as follows:
is assumed in the calculation. The second example corresponds to
Figure 2.9. A large-area device contains small devices in the latter case.
Let us consider the total depletion in the gate. Moving carriers are neglected. The surface electric field governed by the oxide field is negligibly influenced by variations in , because of . We omit from discussion. The gate capacitance in depletion is related to by . Therefore, becomes approximately gaussian distributed as well. For the bulk capacitance in 2.23, holds on the inversion side of the - curve. Thereby, the gate capacitance becomes which can be further approximated by , valid if . Simple analytical considerations lead to , where the line over the quantity denotes the mathematical expectation. Similarly, for the surface potential in depletion one obtains . We have exploited the inequality , valid for a random variable which is gaussian distributed. Therefore, the statistical variations in the gate doping not only induce fluctuations in across the large device, but also increase the mean value of and lower the mean value of measured on a large device. A similar result has been obtained by numerical simulation of the effect of bulk doping fluctuations on the threshold voltage of small MOSFETs in [339]. The slight changes of and in depletion region following from analytical considerations are completely in coherence with results from statistical simulations, Figure 2.13.
More important than small changes occurring in the gate depletion is the impact of the point fluctuations of dopants on inversion at the gate/oxide interface. Let us assume . It follows for the Debye length at . A parallelopiped with base and height (comparable with the depth of depleted region) contains only dopant atoms on average, namely there are atoms in the first from the gate/oxide interface. Any macroscopic approach to and space charge density is no longer valid with respect to the carrier concentrations. Model-calculations accounting for the dopant fluctuations and experiments have shown that the stretch-out of the gate-channel capacitance of MOS-system already takes place at a bulk doping of at room temperature [504] (see also [506]). The same effect occurs in the gate-channel capacitance associated with the gate (minority carrier component in on the inversion side), producing a stretch-out in as well. This effect has been at least qualitatively reproduced in our statistical simulations shown in Figure 2.13, in comparison with experimental data for similar devices. Moreover, by increasing the dopant concentration , the gate-channel capacitance becomes smoother. This fact can qualitatively explain Fig.1 in [281], which shows a fast inversion in the low-doped gate and a smooth recovery for the heavy-doped one. Finally, we think the random distribution of dopants in a shallow depleted region close to the gate/oxide interface is an obvious explanation for the smooth inversion in heavily doped gates [167].