The two-dimensional case is, of course, very similar to the three-dimensional one. Equations (5.35) and (5.36) correspond to
The boundary
of the two-dimensional domain
is
divided into a Dirichlet boundary
and a Neumann boundary
for (5.72) and into a Dirichlet boundary
and a Neumann boundary
for (5.73)
![]() |
The Dirichlet boundary conditions define values for
on the nodes
belonging to the Dirichlet boundary
or for the tangential
component of
on the edges belonging to the Dirichlet boundary
. The finite element analysis is performed as for the
three-dimensional case: The unknown functions in (5.72)
and (5.73) are substituted by their
approximations, the corresponding residua are weighted by vector and scalar
trial functions, and the weak formulation (the law of Gauß) is applied.
Thereby the boundary conditions on
and
arise analogously to (5.29) and (5.31)
and read
Often the shape and the dimensions
of the simulation domain are chosen to assume the boundary conditions
and
are zero.
For example this is the case, if the electric field
is normal to the Neumann boundary
or if the magnetic
flux
has no normal component to the Neumann boundary
, or if the simulation domain is sufficiently large
to assume that
is zero on
and
is zero on
. If the
boundary conditions
and
have to be considered,
for example to combine the finite element analysis with the
boundary element method, the corresponding element matrices are
calculated in the Appendix in Section B.1,
Subsection B.2.1 and
Subsection B.2.2.
The domain is discretized in triangular elements and the boundary in curves, respectively.