For digital applications an enhancement type InAlAs/InGaAs HEMT is developed for a gate length
between
= 150 nm and 70 nm. Fig 7.44 shows the simulated and measured transfer
characteristics of the device with
= 150 nm. Modeling of the device in good agreement with
measurement data is possible. The difference of the
voltage for the bias can be precisely
fit. This precision is necessary to evaluate the capacitances
and
as a function of
bias. In (4.29) in Chapter 4 an integral is evaluated to calculate a speed relevant
average value of the capacitances
and
for the voltage sweep in a digital
application. This quantity can be extracted from device simulation, and thus variations of the
physical parameters be evaluated based on the agreement given in Fig. 7.44.
Fig. 7.45 shows the calculated reduction of
a function of the relative dielectric
constant of the passivation. Two gate shapes are considered: Gate shape 1 supplies an estimate of
an average gate shapes during production, while Gate shape 2 simulates a very steep gate stem with
reduced contributions to
, as was shown for pseudomorphic HEMTs in [50].
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Variations of the threshold voltage
are very important to estimate and control for
digital applications in order to achieve defined off- and on-switch-states in circuits during
operation. Fig. 7.46 shows the simulated and measured dependence of
on the
gate-to-channel separation
relative to the nominal value of
for a
= 100 nm
InAlAs/InGaAs device. The dependence of
/
is found to be about -80 mV/nm
for the device investigated.
To obtain an enhancement type HEMT for such high frequency of operation, a very
delicate balance of -doping concentration, gate-to-channel separation
, and distance
of
-doping to channel is analyzed.
Fig. 7.47 shows the dependence of
on the
-doping concentration
introduced by MBE growth for an otherwise constant device. For concentrations taken from the linear
range of Fig. 3.24 complete activation of the added donors is assumed.
Fig. 7.48 shows the simulated and measured
for
1 V for a device with
= 150 nm. The
agreement in this bias range requires a detailed analysis of the
ohmic contact situation to model the linear region of the device.
Due to the geometry (cap thickness) and the alloying process,
contact Case I from Fig. 3.25 can be assumed in the
simulation. Between simulations and measurements good agreement is
achieved. As can be seen in Fig. 7.48,
as a function
of
bias rises stronger than linear to the maximum value
for constant
.