Erasmus Langer
Siegfried Selberherr
Elaf Al-Ani
Hajdin Ceric
Siddhartha Dhar
Robert Entner
Klaus-Tibor Grasser
René Heinzl
Clemens Heitzinger
Christian Hollauer
Stefan Holzer
Gerhard Karlowatz
Markus Karner
Hans Kosina
Ling Li
Gregor Meller
Johannes Mesa Pascasio
Mihail Nedjalkov
Alexandre Nentchev
Vassil Palankovski
Mahdi Pourfath
Philipp Schwaha
Alireza Sheikholeslami
Michael Spevak
Viktor Sverdlov
Oliver Triebl
Stephan-Enzo Ungersböck
Martin Wagner
Wilfried Wessner
Robert Wittmann

Oliver Triebl
Dipl.-Ing.
triebl(!at)iue.tuwien.ac.at
Biography:
Oliver Triebl was born in Vienna, Austria, in 1977. He studied electrical engineering at the Technische Universität Wien where he received the degree of Diplomingenieur in 2005. He joined the Institute for Microelectronics in June 2005, where he is currently working on his doctoral degree. His current scientific interests include device simulation, Smart-Power-Devices and reliability investigation.

Simulation of Snapback Effects in Smart Power Devices

In integrated circuits, interfering signals can drive bipolar configurations into snapback and this results in high current densities that may cause damage. Due to the increasing density of devices and the integration of several functional blocks with different power domains on a single chip, the presence of parasitic bipolar configurations that can be driven into snapback has to be taken into account. Automotive systems are an important application area in which it is necessary to consider this effect. These systems are often exposed to high energetic interfering signals, on both supply and data lines, that may force the device into snapback. As long as the driving voltage lies above the snapback holding voltage, the current density remains high and the destruction process goes on and will cause damage to the device. To avoid this self-destruction process, the goal in designing integrated circuits is therefore to keep this snapback holding voltage of parasitic bipolar configurations high, at least above the supply voltage. To keep this structure from being driven into snapback, the snapback voltage itself lies in the best case above the highest possible voltage that results from interfering signals.
The snapback effect is not always an unwanted operating condition. It can be systematically utilized as an ESD protection mechanism. Therefore a lateral n-p-n structure of a gate-grounded MOSFET near the input contact is driven into snapback during an ESD stress. In this application, the design goal is not to keep the snapback holding voltage higher than the supply voltage. Instead, it has to be low to keep the maximum local power dissipation resulting from the current through the protection device low. The behavior of the protection device going into snapback is primarily given by the snapback voltage, and it must be assured that the protection circuit is driven into snapback before there may be any damage to the protected circuit.
In both cases the snapback effect influences the reliability of integrated circuits. Simulation of this snapback phenomenon allows design decisions to be made to adapt the different characteristic values with the goal of increasing overall reliability. Simulation allows the consequences of changing doping profiles, the shape of the p- or n-wells or the distances between well borders and contacts to be investigated. This allows the snapback holding voltage and the breakdown voltage itself to be adjusted and dynamic and thermal aspects to be involved in the design. Considering these results in the design of future smart power devices helps to improve the overall reliability.


Schematized I/V characteristic of the snapback effect.


Home | Activities | Staff | Publications | Sponsors |Contact Us