The next model we want to discuss assumes a parabolic dispersion for both the sample and the partner electron, which is the standard model often used in literature. Some integrals can be solved analytically if a parabolic and isotropic dispersion relation is assumed for the sample electrons:
The total scattering rate is defined as
We use formulation (5.54) and introduce spherical polar coordinates with defining the polar axis.
Here, we make use of the relation
Defining and the scaled variables
we obtain
The double integral defines a function :
Evaluating the -integral will result in an error function. However, by applying integration by parts in the error function can be avoided. We use
where and are defined as:
For the antiderivative and the partial derivative of we find:
Inserting these expression in (5.84) gives
Now integration over can be carried out.
Back substitution of the functions and gives
The asymptotic behavior of is discussed in Appendix A.5.2
With back substitution of and , the single-particle scattering can be reformulated to
The pre-factor C (5.56) with (5.49) reads
Inserting the definition of (5.2), the pre-factor becomes independent of the electron density .
The electron-electron scattering rate only depends on the electron density through the screening parameter in the function . Since shows up in the denominator of the integral in , the electron-electron scattering decreases at higher electron concentrations.
In the previous section the total scattering rate was calculated by integrating the scattering rate . The latter is the result of another integration. Thus the total scattering rate is obtained by two consecutive integrations. Inserting (5.26) in (5.79) and assuming Boltzmann statistics gives
In this section we reverse the order of integration and perform the -integration first. The result of the first integration is the two-particle scattering rate .
For a parabolic band the argument of the -function in (5.90) becomes
Here we have introduced the difference vector defined as
and , the angle between and . In a spherical polar coordinate system, with as the polar axis and as the polar angle, the energy conservation requires a positive
Since and are positive by definition the allowed range of is
With (5.91) the integral (5.90) becomes
We carry out the -integration first. Defining we obtain
Note that restricts the domain of integration to .
With the pre-factor (5.49), the scattering rate can be evaluated as [100]:
Having evaluated the -integral in (5.89), we now evaluate the -integral. The single-particle scattering rate can be calculated by integrating the two-particle scattering rate against the normalized probability density , see [100].
The variable substitution
leads to the following expression for the single-particle scattering rate
Introducing scaled variables
the Boltzmann term can be reformulated as
the -integral in (5.98) can be evaluated analytically:
The function is defined in (5.85), which leads finally to the single-particle scattering rate (5.86).
In the first step the wave vector of the partner electron is selected randomly from an equilibrium Maxwellian distribution. With the current wave vector of the sample electron the difference vetor is computed
The two-particle scattering rate can be used to calculate the momentum transfer . For this purpose the integrand in (5.95) can be used as a probability density for . We define as:
The normalized cumulative probability distribution is
The random number is generated using the inversion method, see Section 3.3.2.
The polar angle is given by (5.93):
With a second random number the azimuthal angle is generated from a uniform distribution in .
From the 3D vector can be constructed. Note that the polar axis is given by the difference vector . In the last step the final state is computed.
« PreviousUpNext »Contents