So far the recoverable component of BTI has been successfully explained using the four-state NMP model. For simplicity, the DW model had been used to describe . Although the latter explains the limited amount of experimental data available at that time, it does not rely on a correct physical mechanism. In order to provide a accurate description of the permanent threshold voltage shift the HR model has been introduced.
The HR model relies on chemical reactions between H atoms with defects and hydrogen transport through the oxide. These mechanisms are supported by DFT calculations.
At the beginning is studied on a large-area pMOSFET subjected to zero volt at all four terminals of the transistor,
. Subsequently,
sweeps are recorded and
extracted. Quite remarkably, a drift of
was found over several days, see Figure 13.7.
At higher temperatures gets more pronounced, a consequence of newly created defects. Note, during fabrication a forming gas anneal process step with a duration of typical
at
is performed. Compared to the time scale of defects determining P, several days up to months, see Figure 13.7, the annealing step is an order of magnitude smaller.
Furthermore, earlier publications assumed that
simply to be baked “away” at higher
. This notion has to be carefully reconsidered, since also at zero bias a significant amount of
is accumulated, albeit on a very large time scale.
Figure 13.8 shows the characteristics of extracted from our first long exploratory time experiment.
Figure 13.8: During the long term experiment the stress voltage and the temperature is varied. To measure the sweeps and analyze
, the temperature was switched back to
. During stress phases with
(B,D, and F) a lot of new defects are created and thus
increases. In contrast,
only changes slightly at cycles A,C, and E where
. During phases G and I a considerable reduction of
is visible. At the end of the cycles the latter shows a slightly higher
due to additional defects with very long time constants created in phase H. First, the HR model is evaluated considering a fixed total number of reactive H atoms (blue dashed). As can be seen, phase F, where a large number new defects are created, is not covered
by this model. Next, the HR model considers an H
reservoir located at the gate side. With this extension the HR model explains the behavior of
in all phases well [MWC6].
A single large-area pMOSFET has been probed for sixty days. The stress bias was switched between and
while the device temperature was changed to
,
and
. After each stress cycle the temperature is switched back to
where the
sweeps are recorded. From each voltage sweep cycle a new
is obtained. Figure 13.8 clearly shows a large increase in
during the stress phases with
. In contrast, when
is applied,
changes only slightly. The characteristics of
recorded over several month can be nicely explained by the HR model.
A second long-term experiment has been performed on a virgin pMOSFET with dimensions . This time the stress bias of
is applied during
cycles. Again,
is extracted from 20
sweeps performed at
. Figure 13.9 shows the characteristics of
recorded from measurements during 90 days.
Figure 13.9: The second long term experiment is performed with alternating /
and
/
cycles. During phase B a lot of
is built up and saturates, however, during the subsequent phase C all these defects can get neutralized and
is settled at the same level as in phase A. Next, during phase E and F a small number of new defects are created. Furthermore, a reversal of the degradation has been observed during E and F. During the stress cycle H performed at
/
many new defects are created. As can be seen, the HR without H
reservoir can not reproduce the experimental data, however, by considering the proposed H
reservoir the HR model covers the behavior of
[MWC6].
Quite remarkably, although the device is heavily stressed during phase D, the permanent component decreases. This degradation reversal behavior is due to defects with an energy level close to the valence band edge which are annealed in phase B and can not be recharged again during phase D. Except for the degradation reversal, which requires closer inspection, the HR model again is able to explain the experimental data very well.
« PreviousUpNext »Contents